JUNTOS Radio: a podcast created in collaboration with Spanish-speaking healthcare providers, Juntos Center for Advancing Latino Health, and a medical librarian.

Spanish speaking healthcare providers, JUNTOS Center for Advancing Latino Health, and a medical librarian partnered to create a podcast on essential health topics relevant to the Latinx community. The podcasts were recorded in Spanish and included Spanish supplementary consumer health information from credible resources such as MedlinePlus en Espanol. The podcasts covered important topics about COVID-19 such as vaccines, clinical trials, and social distancing. It also includes other relevant topics that are affecting the Latinx community.

Patient Comprehension of Operative Instructions With a Paper Handout Versus a Video: A Prospective Randomized Control Trial.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of a video versus that of a paper handout for explaining operative instructions for hand and upper extremity surgeries to patients. We aimed to compare patient performance using a knowledge-based questionnaire. In addition, we aimed to compare how helpful patients found their assigned operative instructions. METHODS: This was a randomized trial of 60 patients undergoing same-day hand and upper extremity surgeries. The patients were randomized to receive educational material outlining operative instructions, either in the form of a video link or a paper handout. At the first postoperative visit, the patients' comprehension of the content was evaluated using a questionnaire. The primary outcomes included the number of questions answered correctly and patient-reported evaluation of the provided instructions on a scale of 1-5. RESULTS: Patients who received video instructions scored higher in the questionnaire than those in the paper instructions group (paper: 58% correct; video: 76% correct). Moreover, patients in the video group were significantly more likely to answer questions pertaining to opioid use correctly. A higher proportion of patients in the video group than in the paper group found the information "extremely" or "very" helpful. CONCLUSIONS: This study found that the patients demonstrated greater comprehension of the operative instructions when these were administered in a video format than when these were administered as a printed handout. In particular, the results suggest that video-based education specifically improves patients' comprehension of proper opioid use. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: There appears to be utility in implementing videos for patient education purposes, particularly in the setting of operative instructions for same-day surgical procedures.

Escala de bienestar académico vía aplicación web para estudiantes universitarios en Brasil / Academic wellbeing scale via web application for university students in Brazil / Escalade bem-estar acadêmico via aplicação web para universitários no Brasil

Este es un estudio de desarrollo tecnológico en la elaboración de un instrumento computarizado para evaluar la autopercepción del bienestar académico, basado en la teoría del bienestar subjetivo de la Psicología Positiva. Tuvo como objetivo construir un instrumento y buscar evidencias de validez vía aplicación web como tecnología para evaluar el constructo bienestar académico en estudiantes universitarios. Investigación de campo, descriptiva y exploratoria, cuantitativa, con 702 académicos voluntarios de Universidades de diferentes regiones geopolíticas de Brasil Se identificó que la mayoría de los encuestados son del sexo femenino con un 76,9% (540), y se obtuvo un promedio de 23,79 para su edad, con una desviación estándar de 6,7. En la construcción del instrumento se obtuvieron factores relacionados con el contenido de bienestar académico, se definió un valor propio igual o superior a 0,44. Así, fueron evidenciados 03 Factores: Factor 01 -Autoconfianza y rendimiento académico profesional, con 27 ítems; Factor 02 -Apoyo social con 2 ítems; y Factor 3 -Limitaciones de desempeño autopercibidas, con 11 ítems. La escala total tuvo un Alfa de 0,90, con una versión final de 40 ítems. Las condiciones de validez están garantizadas, así como la fiabilidad de las tres subescalas y la escala completa. Tales aspectos de la evaluación del bienestar académico pueden ser utilizados en verificaciones posteriores al regreso de las actividades universitarias, identificando posibilidades de cambios en el escenario académico y estrategias de intervención y readaptaciones conductuales(AU)

It is a study of technological development in the elaboration of a computerized instrument to evaluate the self-perception of academic well-being, based on the theory of subjective well-being of Positive Psychology. It aimed to build an instrument and seek evidence of validity via web application as a technology to assess the academic well-being construct in university students. Field research, descriptive and exploratory, quantitative, with 702 volunteer academics from Universities from different geopolitical regions in Brazil. It was identified that the majority of respondents are female with 76.9% (540), and the average age of these was 23.79, being standard deviationde 6,7.In the construction of the instrument, factors related to the content of academic well-being were obtained, with an Eigenvalue equal to or greater than 0.44 was defined. Thus, 03 Factors were evidenced: Factor 01 -Self-confidence and professional academic achievement, with 27 items; Factor 02 -Social support with 2 items; and Factor 3 -Self-perceived limitations in performance, with 11 items. The total scale had an Alpha of 0.90 with 40 items in its final version. The validity conditions are guaranteed,together with the reliability of the three subscales and the full scale. Such aspects of the assessment of academic well-being can be used in subsequent verifications after the return of university activities, identifying possibilities for changes in the academic scenario and intervention strategies and behavioral readaptations(AU)

Trata-se de um estudo de desenvolvimento tecnológico na elaboração de um instrumento informatizado para avaliação da autopercepção do bem-estar acadêmico, com base na teoriado bem-estar subjetivo da Psicologia Positiva. Teve como objetivo construir um instrumento e buscar evidências de validade via aplicação web como tecnologia para avaliação do construto de bem-estar acadêmico em estudantes universitários. Investigação de campo, descritiva e exploratória, quantitativa, com 702 acadêmicos voluntários de Universidades de diferentes regiões geopolíticas no Brasil. Identificou-se que os respondentes em sua maioria são dosexo feminino com 76,9% (540), e obteve-se sobre a idade destes a média de 23,79, sendo desvio padrãode 6,7. Na construção do instrumento, obteve-se fatores relacionadas ao conteúdo do bem-estar acadêmico, com Eigenvalue igual ou superior a 0,44 foi definido. Assim, foram evidenciado 03 Fatores: Fator 01 -Autoconfiança e realização acadêmica profissional, com 27 itens; Fator 02 -Apoio social com 2 itens; e o Fator 3 -Limitações autopercebidas no rendimento, com 11 itens. A escala total apresentou um Alfa de 0,90, com versão final de 40 itens. Estando as condições de validade garantidas, juntamente com a confiabilidade, das três subescalas e da escala total asseguradas. Tais aspectos da avaliação do bem-estar acadêmico, podem ser empregados em verificações subsequentes ao retorno das atividades universitárias, identificando possibilidades de alterações no cenário acadêmico e estratégias de intervenções e readaptações comportamentais(AU)

Jogo de espelhos: a interferência dos estereótipos na fala dos comunicadores de rádio e podcast / The mirror game: the interference of stereotypes in the speech of radio and podcast communicators / El juego del espejo: la interferencia de los estereotipos en el discurso de los comunicadores de radio y podcast

Introdução: Ouvintes de rádio e podcast deduzem traços de personalidade quando ouvem os apresentadores, a partir exclusivamente da fala desses profissionais. Objetivo: Identificar os fatores que interferem na atribuição de características de personalidade a partir da voz, e discutir como o julgamento do público pode modificar a performance dos apresentadores de rádio e podcast. Método: Por meio de um levantamento bibliográfico inicial, foram apresentadas referências bibliográficas sobre pesquisas de julgamento de voz, considerando aspectos socioculturais e de gênero, e a interferência dos estereótipos no comportamento e na fala dos indivíduos. Resultados: Pesquisas de julgamento de personalidade pela voz indicam que a avaliação dos ouvintes se baseia nos traços de personalidade mais marcantes e valorizados socialmente, ou seja, os estereótipos. Considerando que os mesmos valores são compartilhados também pelos comunicadores, é possível supor que esses procurem imprimir na sua fala características que agradem ao público. Conclusão: A tentativa de corresponder aos estereótipos parece resultar na padronização da fala dos comunicadores de rádio e podcast.

Introduction: Radio and podcast listeners deduce personality traits when they listen to presenters, exclusively from the speech of these professionals. Objective: To identify the factors that interfere in the attribution of personality characteristics based on the voice, and to discuss how the audience ́s judgment can modify the performance of radio and podcast presenters. Methods: Through initial bibliographic survey, bibliographical references on voice judgment research were presented, considering sociocultural and gender aspects, and the interference of stereotypes in the behavior and speech of individuals. Results:Surveys of personality judgment by voice indicate that the listeners; assessment is based on the most striking and socially valued personality traits: the stereotypes. Considering that the same values are also shared by communicators, it is possible to suppose that they try imprinting characteristics in their speech that please the public. Conclusion: The attempt to correspond to stereotypes seems to result in the standardization of the speech of radio and podcast communicators.

Introducción: Los oyentes de radio y podcasts deducen rasgos de personalidad cuando escuchan a los presentadores, exclusivamente del discurso de estos profesionales. Objetivo: Identificar los factores que interfieren en la atribución de características de personalidad basadas en la voz y discutir cómo el juicio de la audiencia puede modificar el desempeño de los presentadores de radio y podcast. Metodos:Através de un estudio bibliográfico inicial, se presentaron referencias bibliográficas sobre investigaciones de juicio de voz, considerando aspectos socioculturales y de género, y la interferencia de estereotipos en la conducta y el habla de los individuos. Resultados: Las encuestas de juicio de personalidad por voz indican que la valoración de los oyentes se basa en los rasgos de personalidad más llamativos y valorados socialmente, es decir, los estereotipos. Teniendo en cuenta que los mismos valores también los comparten los comunicadores, es posible suponer que intentan imprimir en su discurso características que agraden al público. Conclusión: El intento de corresponder a los estereotipos parece resultar en la estandarización del habla de los comunicadores de radio y podcast.

Live-streaming otolaryngology surgical procedures for virtual medical student rotations.

BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic created challenges in surgical education that expedited the development of virtual learning. Virtual rotations have been one such solution. However, they require co-ordination and technological equipment to create a meaningful, interactive experience for students. METHODS: Various otolaryngology surgical procedures were live-streamed during a two-week virtual rotation for medical students. A mobile audiovisual cart comprising a computer mounted with a webcam and microphone/speaker were utilised to live-stream from four sources: video-assisted telescope operating monitor ('VITOM') exoscope, microscope, endoscope and room camera. A dedicated faculty member, who was not the operating surgeon, was present to facilitate students' understanding of the procedure. CONCLUSION: A wide breadth of otolaryngology surgical procedures were live-streamed via a mobile audiovisual computer, including views of the room, endoscopic views, microscopic views and open views via an exoscope (video-assisted telescope operating monitor). This virtual rotation set-up, along with the dedicated faculty facilitator, reduced the burden on the operating surgeon and enhanced students' learning experience.

Evaluating the efficacy of self-study videos for the surgery clerkship rotation: an innovative project in undergraduate surgical education.

Background: Educational videos have become valuable resources and can address some of the pitfalls of traditional learning. To ensure clerkship students have adequate exposure to curriculum objectives, a series of objective-aligned self-directed learning video podcasts covering core surgical concepts were developed by medical students and surgical residents. The objective of the study was to evaluate the efficacy of the video podcasts in the surgery clerkship rotation. Methods: Nineteen video podcasts were created, housed at www.surgicaleducationportal.com, and distributed to third-year medical students completing their surgical clerkship. A 10-question multiple-choice quiz was administered before and after students viewed each video, and they were also asked to complete a satisfaction survey. Results: A total of 302 paired pretests and posttests were completed. There was a mean increase of 2.7 points in posttest scores compared with pretest scores (p < 0.001). On a Likert scale from 1 to 5, with 5 being excellent, students rated the usefulness of the videos as 4.3, the quality of the content as 4.3 and the quality of the video as 4.2. Ninety-eight percent of students would recommend these videos to their classmates. Conclusion: Video podcasts are an effective modality for engaging medical students and may improve standardization of learning during their surgical clerkship.

Contexte: Les vidéos de formation sont devenues d'inestimables ressources et elles peuvent combler certaines des lacunes de l'enseignement traditionnel. Pour que les résidents bénéficient d'une exposition adéquate aux objectifs curriculaires, une série de balados vidéo d'autoapprentissage centrés sur des objectifs reliés aux principaux concepts de chirurgie a été réalisée par des étudiants en médecine et des résidents en chirurgie. L'objectif de l'étude était d'évaluer l'efficacité des balados pour les stages de chirurgie. Méthodes: Dix-neuf balados vidéo ont été réalisés (accessibles en anglais au www.surgicaleducationportal.com) et distribués à des étudiants de troisième année de médecine qui effectuent leur stage de chirurgie. Un questionnaire en 10 points à choix multiples leur a été administré avant et après le visionnement de chaque vidéo; ils ont ensuite été invités à répondre à un questionnaire d'évaluation. Résultats: En tout 302 pré- et post-tests appariés ont été effectués. On a observé une augmentation de 2,7 points aux scores post-test, comparativement aux scores pré-test (p < 0,001). Sur une échelle de Likert allant de 1 à 5, 5 correspondant à excellent, les étudiants ont accordé un score de 4,3 pour l'utilité des balados vidéo et de 4,2 pour leur qualité. Quatre-vingt-dix-huit pour cent des étudiants recommanderaient ces balados vidéo à leurs camarades. Conclusion: Les balados vidéo sont une modalité efficace pour mobiliser les étudiants en médecine et pourraient faciliter l'uniformisation de l'apprentissage lors des stages de chirurgie.

Outcomes of EAU-endorsed Live Surgical Events over a 5-year Period (2015-2020) and Updated Guidelines from the EAU Live Surgery Committee.

CONTEXT: Live surgery events (LSEs) have been used in all surgical fields for education and training and to demonstrate new techniques. The European Association of Urology (EAU) live surgery guidelines were established in 2014. OBJECTIVE: To review the compliance of outcomes for procedures performed at EAU-affiliated LSEs with the 2014 guidelines and to establish updated guidelines for LSEs and semi-LSEs. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: Patients from EAU-affiliated LSEs were included for all surgical procedures carried out between January 2015 and January 2020. All these events were pre-evaluated by the EAU Live Surgery Committee and met the criteria for an EAU LSE, with outcomes recorded and submitted to the registry. Data were collected for the type of procedure and for intraoperative and short- and long-term complications. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: A total of 246 procedures were performed across 18 LSEs, with an annual volume ranging from 19 to 74 procedures. These included 109 (44.3%) robot-assisted procedures, 21 (8.5%) laparoscopic procedures, 10 (4%) transurethral bladder procedures, 11 (4.4%) prostate enucleation procedures, 72 (29.2%) endourological procedures, and 23 (9.3%) andrology or reconstruction procedures. A total of 77 different surgical techniques and variations for 55 different types of surgery were performed as LSEs over the past 5 yr. There were 44 (17.8%) short-term complications and 11.3% (nine/79) long-term complications observed, with Clavien grade III/IV complications seen in 5.2% and 7.5% of cases over short- and long-term follow-up, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The 5-yr outcomes for EAU LSEs show that they are safe and follow previous guidelines set by the panel. It seems likely that the fine balance between patient safety and educational value might be best achieved if LSEs are performed by local surgeons in their parent hospital with patients and staff they know, and that technological advances will make live streaming a seamless process. The current EAU Live Surgery Committee has updated the guidelines on LSEs and provided new guidelines for semi-live events. PATIENT SUMMARY: We reviewed 5-year outcomes for live surgery events endorsed by the European Association of Urology. We found that the operations carried out at these events were safe and followed the guidelines previously set. We have updated the guidelines and provided new guidelines for semi-live events.

Ensino do processo de enfermagem segundo os vídeos do youtube: estudo descritivo-exploratório / Teaching the nursing process according to youtube videos: a descriptive-exploratory study / Enseñanza del proceso de enfermería según videos de youtube: estudio descriptivo-exploratorio

OBJETIVO: Identificar os vídeos do YouTube sobre o Processo de Enfermagem como temática de ensino no contexto nacional. MÉTODO: Estudo descritivo-exploratório, quanti-qualitativo, realizado com vídeos do YouTube em novembro de 2019, no qual identificou-se, principalmente, a data da postagem e total de visualizações, autor, categoria do vídeo, participante e conteúdo. RESULTADOS: Dentre os 23 vídeos da amostra final, foram identificados vídeos no período de 2016 a 2019, com predomínio do ano de 2018 (10; 43,9%), profissionais de enfermagem (17; 65,3%) na qualidade de participante, e definição de Processo de Enfermagem (12, 27,2%) como conteúdo abordado. DISCUSSÃO: A facilidade de acesso, a existência de sites de compartilhamento de vídeos, a importância do Processo de Enfermagem e o desenvolvimento de parcerias entre organizações de ensino e de saúde potencializam a construção de ferramentas audiovisuais. CONCLUSÃO: os vídeos explanam o conceito do Processo de Enfermagem e suas etapas e apresentam o conteúdo mediante uma exposição dialogada.

OBJECTIVE: To identify YouTube videos on the Nursing Process as a teaching theme in the national context. METHOD: A descriptive-exploratory and quanti-qualitative study, carried out with YouTube videos in November 2019, in which the main data identified were posting date and total views, author, video category, participant and content. RESULTS: Among the 23 videos in the final sample, videos were identified in the period from 2016 to 2019, with predominance of the year 2018 (10; 43.9%), nursing professionals (17; 65.3%) as participants, and definition of the Nursing Process (12, 27.2%) as the content addressed. DISCUSSION: Ease of access, existence of video sharing websites, the importance of the Nursing Process, and the development of partnerships between teaching and health organizations enhance the construction of audiovisual tools. CONCLUSION: The videos explain the concept of the Nursing Process and its stages and display the content through dialogical exposition.

OBJETIVO: Identificar los videos de YouTube sobre el Proceso de Enfermería como tema de enseñanza en el contexto nacional. MÉTODO: Estudio descriptivo-exploratorio cuantitativo y cualitativo, realizado con videos de YouTube en noviembre de 2019, en el cual se identificó fecha de publicación y visualizaciones totales, autor, categoría del video, participante y contenido. RESULTADOS: Entre los 23 videos de la muestra final, se identificaron videos en el período de 2016 a 2019, con predominio del año 2018 (10; 43,9%), profesionales de enfermería (17; 65,3%) como participantes, y definición del Proceso de Enfermería (12, 27,2%) como contenido abordado. DISCUSIÓN: La facilidad de acceso, la existencia de sitios para compartir videos, la importancia del Proceso de Enfermería y el desarrollo de alianzas entre organizaciones docentes y de salud potencian la construcción de herramientas audiovisuales. CONCLUSIÓN: los videos explican el concepto del Proceso de Enfermería y sus etapas y presentan el contenido a través de una exposición dialógica.

Development and Utilization of a Medical Student Surgery Podcast During COVID-19.

BACKGROUND: The 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic drastically reduced learning opportunities for medical students. We sought to determine the cost and success of implementation of a podcast for a surgical department in a large academic hospital. METHODS: We created a podcast series for Israeli medical students during the COVID-19 epidemic based on the Medical Student Core Curriculum of the American College of Surgeons / Association for Surgical Education. Episodes were available for free download or streaming on a designated website and popular podcast platforms. Podcast analytics were used to measure public listeners and uptake. RESULTS: Total development time was 90 hours at an estimated cost of $7091 USD. A total of 10 episodes were released between March 21, 2020 and August 31, 2020. An average of 9 ± 1.26 h (range 2-6) was required to generate each episode, including 3.4 ± 1.26 h (2-6) for content review and 5.6 ± 2 h (4-10) for audio production. An average episode ran for 35.9 ± 4.3 min (28-42). Podcasts recorded a total of 5678 downloads, with an average of 228 and 336 downloads per episode in the first 30 and 90 days, respectively. The average daily downloads before the students returned to clinical rotations (March 21-April 30) was 48 ± 58.3 (7-283;) compared to 16 ± 7.4 after their return (1-38; P< 0.01). Estimated costs to produce a video-based education series would have been significantly more. CONCLUSION: Podcasts can serve as a cost-effective and quickly produced instructional tool to supplement online learning. Further research is required to determine the efficacy of podcasts versus video-based education modules.

Good Morning, Orthopods: The Growth and Future Implications of Podcasts in Orthopaedic Surgery.

BACKGROUND: As the landscape of medical education evolves with emerging technologies and the COVID-19 pandemic, e-learning platforms continue to gain popularity. Orthopaedic podcasts, a burgeoning e-learning platform, continue to gain traction; however, there is a paucity of information regarding their coverage of topics and their distribution over time. Therefore, our analysis sought to (1) characterize podcast content related to orthopaedic surgery, and (2) evaluate the changes in the prevalence of orthopaedic podcasts over the past 15 years. METHODS: Three common podcasting platforms (Apple Podcasts, Google Podcasts, and Spotify) were queried using the key terms "orthopaedic," "orthopedic," and "ortho" in order to identify a list of podcasts that are related to orthopaedic surgery. For each unique orthopaedic podcast, the title, the show description, the number of episodes, the date of the first episode, the date of the most recent episode, and episode frequency were collected. Podcasts were then classified based on a predetermined list of podcast domains. The number of existing active (released within the last 3 months) orthopaedic podcasts was then trended on a monthly basis from 2011 to 2020. RESULTS: Ninety-four unique podcasts met inclusion criteria, 62 of which remained active as of October 25, 2020. The most common podcast domains were "general" (38 [40.4%]) and "clinical knowledge" (20 [21.3%]). Among the assessed podcasts, 90 (95.7%) utilized an exclusively audio format. The majority of podcasts were based in the United States (89.4%), included introductory music (72.3%), and included interviews (63.8%). Most podcast hosts were practicing orthopaedic surgeons (52.1%). Between January 2016 and October 2020, the number of active orthopaedic surgery podcasts grew more than twelvefold (1,240%) at an average rate of roughly 1 new podcast each month (average, 1.0 podcast; standard deviation, 1.8). DISCUSSION: The past decade has seen sizable growth in the number of readily available podcasts related to orthopaedic surgery. Additional research is required to independently assess the quality of these resources and their implications for remote trainee education.

Perception among ophthalmologists about webinars as a method of continued medical education during COVID-19 pandemic.

PURPOSE: To ascertain ophthalmologist's perceptions about webinars as a method of continued medical education during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: In a cross-sectional study, a 21-question survey was circulated using digital media platform to approximately 1400 ophthalmologists in India between 16th August 2020 to 31st August 2020. The questionnaire focussed on the quality and usefulness of webinars based on the Bloom's taxonomy. The responses (on 4- or 5-point Likert scale) were analyzed among three professional groups- ophthalmologists in-training, consultants in public sector, and private practitioners. RESULTS: 393 ophthalmologists participated in the survey, with a response rate of 28%. The mean age was 34.6 ± 9.7 years, and males constituted 49.6% (199/393) of the respondents. Forty-seven percent of the respondents perceived the quality of webinars as good or excellent (185/393), 72.8% reported knowledge gain from webinars (286/393), and 63.9% felt that webinars are important in clinical practice and should continue post-COVID-19 pandemic (251/393), with distinct responses among the professional groups. The drawbacks perceived were overt number of webinars (371; 94.4%), confusion regarding which webinars to attend (313; 79.6%), repetition of the information (296; 75.3%), limited opportunity for participant interaction (146; 37.2%) and disparate weightage to the core disciplines of Ophthalmology. CONCLUSION: Most respondents had favorable perceptions of Ophthalmology webinars happening during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, there is need for improvisation in the volume of webinars, target-audience-based delivery, and participant interaction to add value to this new dimension of teaching-learning.

COVID-19: A Time Like No Other in (the Department of) Neurological Surgery.

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has disrupted lives and indelibly impacted the practice of medicine since emerging as a pandemic in March 2020. For neurosurgery departments throughout the United States, the pandemic has created unique challenges across subspecialties in devising methods of triage, workflow, and operating room safety. Located in New York City, at the early epicenter of the COVID-19 crisis, the Weill Cornell Medicine Department of Neurological Surgery was disrupted and challenged in many ways, requiring adaptations in clinical operations, workforce management, research, and education. Through our department's collective experience, we offer a glimpse at how our faculty and administrators overcame obstacles, and transformed in the process, at the height of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Exploring the Residents' Perspective on Smart learning Modalities and Contents for Virtual Urology Education: Lesson Learned During the COVID-19 Pandemic. / Explorando la perspectiva de los residentes sobre las modalidades y contenidos de aprendizaje inteligente para la educación virtual de urología: lección aprendida durante la pandemia de la COVID-19.

PURPOSE: The COVID-19 outbreak has substantially altered residents' training activities. While several new virtual learning programs have been recently implemented, the perspective of urology trainees regarding their usefulness still needs to be investigated. METHODS: A cross-sectional, 30-item, web-based Survey was conducted through Twitter from April 4th, 2020 to April 18th, 2020, aiming to evaluate the urology residents' perspective on smart learning (SL) modalities (pre-recorded videos, webinars, podcasts, and social media [SoMe]), and contents (frontal lessons, clinical case discussions, updates on Guidelines and on clinical trials, surgical videos, Journal Clubs, and seminars on leadership and non-technical skills). RESULTS: Overall, 501 urology residents from 58 countries completed the survey. Of these, 78.4, 78.2, 56.9 and 51.9% of them considered pre-recorded videos, interactive webinars, podcasts and SoMe highly useful modalities of smart learning, respectively. The contents considered as highly useful by the greatest proportion of residents were updates on guidelines (84.8%) and surgical videos (81.0%). In addition, 58.9 and 56.5% of responders deemed seminars on leadership and on non-technical skills highly useful smart learning contents. The three preferred combinations of smart learning modality and content were: pre-recorded surgical videos, interactive webinars on clinical cases, and pre-recorded videos on guidelines. CONCLUSION: Our study provides the first global «big picture¼ of the smart learning modalities and contents that should be prioritized to optimize virtual Urology education. While this survey was conducted during the COVID-19 outbreak, our findings might have even more impact in the future.

Disputas pela significação no discurso do HIV/aids: um percurso na ciência, na literatura, na militância LGBTI e nos canais do YouTube / Disputes for meaning in the discourse of HIV/AIDS: a journey in science, literature, LGBTI activism and YouTube channels / Disputas por el significado en el discurso del VIH/SIDA: un viaje en ciencia, literatura, activismo LGBTI y canales de YouTube

Este artigo trabalha na perspectiva histórica e na revisão bibliográfica de autores que analisam os recursos da linguagem, como a metáfora, para perceber a construção discursiva do HIV/aids na medicina, na mídia, no campo literário, na militância LGBTI e nos relatos em canais no YouTube de pessoas vivendo com HIV. O objetivo é utilizar as análises da terminologia e da história de luta pela significação de termos associados à doença e ao vírus em cada período. Dessa forma, verificamos que as representações iniciais sobre a condição clínica relacionada à culpa e ao julgamento moral de grupos, já vulneráveis antes da epidemia, não foram totalmente superadas no discurso. Observamos ainda os esforços, ao longo desses 40 anos, no campo da ciência para reduzir o estigma e a discriminação a partir da palavra.

This article works in the historical perspective and in the bibliographic review of authors who analyze language resources, such as the metaphor, to understand the discursive construction of HIV/AIDS in medicine, in the media, in the literary field, in LGBTI activism and in reports on YouTube channels of people living with HIV. The objective is to use the analysis of terminology and history of struggle for the meaning of terms associated with the disease and the virus in each period. We found that the initial representations about the clinical condition related to guilt and the moral judgment of groups, already vulnerable before the epidemic, were not completely overcome in the discourse. We also observe the efforts, over these 40 years, in the field of science to reduce stigma and discrimination based on words.

Este artículo trabaja en la perspectiva histórica y en la revisión bibliográfica de autores que analizan recursos del lenguaje, como la metáfora, para comprender la construcción discursiva del VIH/SIDA en la medicina, en los medios de comunicación, en el campo literario, en el activismo LGBTI y en canales de YouTube de personas que viven con el VIH. El objetivo es utilizar el análisis de la terminología y la historia de las luchas por el significado de los términos asociados a la enfermedad y al virus en cada período. Así, encontramos que las representaciones iniciales sobre el cuadro clínico relacionado con la culpa y el juicio moral de grupos, ya vulnerables antes de la epidemia, no fueron superadas por completo en el discurso. También hemos visto esfuerzos, durante estos 40 años, en el campo de la ciencia para reducir el estigma y la discriminación basados en las palabras.